戀戀師情

評(píng)分：0.2 播放：15萬 更新：2026-05-01

發(fā)生在天主教學(xué)校內(nèi)的同性師生戀故事，于禮教所不容。單純、原始的情感挑戰(zhàn)世俗道德的規(guī)范；不被接納的禁忌彷佛更是凄美，讓她們難以抽身。電影中不只一次提及除下頸上的(十字架)，令人不禁質(zhì)疑此物象征的是一個(gè)信念？還是一個(gè)符號(hào)學(xué)上的否定解說？除下和戴上之間是堅(jiān)持還是對(duì)抗？ 　　

影片推薦

同類精選

影視排行

把家虎

康琳浠,袁家駿,答有為,張?jiān)瓨s,王藝歡,趙鵬,王旭,梁棟,張婷,曹皓程,郭炫辰,杜俊峰,李凱武,蔣鎮(zhèn)澤,蔣鎮(zhèn)陽,岳建剛,楊恩全

　　徐大燕，雖自幼生得標(biāo)致，但卻因?yàn)樾愿駨?qiáng)勢(shì)，持家精打細(xì)算，容不得他人占自己家半點(diǎn)便宜，聞名村里村外，導(dǎo)致已到婚嫁之齡未嫁在家。不平常女子人生也必然不平常，成家后的徐大燕，憑借精密與能干使得原本窮破的家，日漸變得富足與溫馨，更是在其短暫的一生留下諸多感人事跡。

風(fēng)來之所

Slim Baccar,桑杜斯·哈桑,Eya Bellagha,Maya Blouza,穆罕默德·格拉亞,Lassaad Jamoussi,Saoussen Maalej,Lobna Noomene

自父親去世以來，19歲的阿麗莎成了她患有抑郁癥的母親和年幼妹妹的照顧者。她只想逃離自己的責(zé)任以及身邊的痛苦。她最好的朋友梅赫迪（23歲）性格內(nèi)向，患有白癜風(fēng)。盡管他有文憑，卻仍然失業(yè)，這讓他覺得自己對(duì)不起家人。兩人都用幽默和想象力來逃避艱苦的生活。梅赫迪講述并繪制超現(xiàn)實(shí)主義的故事，而阿麗莎則盡可能地重新塑造自己的現(xiàn)實(shí)。當(dāng)他們得知全國范圍內(nèi)舉辦的一場(chǎng)繪畫比賽可能會(huì)改變他們的生活時(shí)，他們偷了一輛車，開始了一場(chǎng)瘋狂的公路旅行。他們的友誼經(jīng)受了考驗(yàn)，他們發(fā)現(xiàn)了突尼斯最好的一面和最壞的一面。他們的希望破滅了，但他們的旅程改變了他們。三個(gè)月后，梅赫迪非法移民離開了，因?yàn)榘Ⅺ惿療o法拋下她的家人。

4度空間大師

羅伯特·蘭辛,李·麥瑞威瑟,James Congdon

　　一位科學(xué)家在一次試驗(yàn)中，發(fā)現(xiàn)用腦波可以使一只鉛筆穿透銅板，不過，他的實(shí)驗(yàn)室在一次大火中毀滅，這位科學(xué)家不得不投靠他的哥哥。他的哥哥也在進(jìn)行著另一項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)，他發(fā)現(xiàn)重新組合原子結(jié)構(gòu)可以產(chǎn)生巨大能量。他與弟弟合作，利用弟弟的腦波和實(shí)驗(yàn)心得，改變?nèi)魏挝镔|(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)，形成“四度空間人”?！　〔贿^，“四度空間人”使用一次均會(huì)失去時(shí)間而老化，必須不斷增加能源，而每次吸取能量，就會(huì)將老化轉(zhuǎn)移他人，于是他不斷殺人以維持青春。究竟四度空間人會(huì)不會(huì)最終被消滅，請(qǐng)觀眾自己品味?！　”酒瑯?gòu)思新穎，運(yùn)用高科技手段拍攝，是觀眾有身臨高科技時(shí)代的感覺，當(dāng)然，這指的是身在影片所屬的年代！

等待方舟

耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.