在線看
同款熱播
飲食男女1994
郎雄,楊貴媚,吳倩蓮,王渝文,張艾嘉,歸亞蕾,趙文瑄,陳昭榮,陳捷文,盧金城,唐語謙,洪其德,王瑞,杜滿生,王玨,陳妤,左正芬,許敬民,聶卓晶,丁仲臺(tái)灣中國(guó)菜碩果僅存的大師老朱(郎雄)退休后,漸嘗老年生活的諸多尷尬:每周日費(fèi)心做出的一桌豐盛菜肴,并無將三個(gè)女兒(楊貴媚、吳倩蓮、王渝文)齊齊拉到飯桌的吸引力,已經(jīng)長(zhǎng)大成人的她們,心里藏了許多比陪父親吃飯更重要的事;多年老友的突然離世,令他在友情這塊也有了缺口;而對(duì)廚師來講最重要的味覺的喪失,則將其徹底推到人生的低谷。三個(gè)女兒雖各忙各事,卻也操心著老朱的晚年生活,計(jì)劃著為其找個(gè)老伴,但她們沒料到老朱早已悄無聲息地談起了“黃昏戀”。吃驚過后,老朱最看重的繼承了他做菜天賦的二女兒家倩因?yàn)樽陨淼纳罱?jīng)歷,對(duì)父親、她與父親的關(guān)系有了新的認(rèn)識(shí),而對(duì)老朱來講更大的驚喜,還在后面。
吉星拱照
周潤(rùn)發(fā),張艾嘉,鄭丹瑞,利智,黃坤玄,黃家駒,葉世榮,黃家強(qiáng),黃貫中林寶生(周潤(rùn)發(fā) 飾)是香港富豪,與表妹玉仙(利智 飾)早已訂婚。但寶生并不喜歡未婚妻的庸俗,決定逃婚,并要證明自己能獨(dú)立生活。出走的第一天,他陰差陽錯(cuò)來到了一個(gè)慈善晚會(huì),認(rèn)識(shí)了晚會(huì)贊助商?hào)|東快餐店的老板(夏雨 飾)與其妹妹(張艾嘉 飾),還成為了快餐店的員工之一。寶生與一群善良的同事度過了一段難忘的時(shí)光,他也看到了自己價(jià)值的存在,與老板的妹妹也產(chǎn)生了感情,但他與表妹的婚期將至,他的真實(shí)身份也將浮出水面,而他與老板妹妹的感情又會(huì)如何呢?
毛骨悚然撞鬼經(jīng) 25周年特別篇
稻垣吾郎,香取慎吾,森七菜,山內(nèi)健司,坂口憲二,生見愛瑠,門脅麥,山口紗彌加,豐島花,布施繪里
村在天堂邊
Axmen Cali Faarax,Canab Axmed Ibraahin,Ahmed Mohamoud Salleban,Axmed Cabdillahi Ducaale,Maxamed Xaaji Cabdi Fadax,Maxamed Axmed Maxamed,Maxamed Maxamuud Jamac,Maxamed Xusen Xasan,Aamino Saalad Gureey,Abdirisaq Daahir Khalif,Adbirisaq Ciise Cawad,Faadumo D在索馬里沙漠的一個(gè)偏遠(yuǎn)村莊,一個(gè)小男孩和爸爸、姑姑一同生活。父親靠臨時(shí)工作支撐家用,姑姑因?yàn)榛橐鑫C(jī)無奈躲到此處。他們樸素的心愿因?yàn)榛靵y不安的社會(huì)環(huán)境變得遙不可及,但家人之間仍充滿溫情瞬間。索馬里裔奧地利導(dǎo)演莫·哈拉韋的長(zhǎng)片首作通過一個(gè)臨時(shí)家庭的境遇來展現(xiàn)動(dòng)蕩時(shí)局對(duì)個(gè)人生活的吞噬。導(dǎo)演溫柔看待三位主人公,他以精致的構(gòu)圖和色彩,在有條不紊的節(jié)奏下,安靜有力地鋪陳越發(fā)緊迫的生存之戰(zhàn)。本片是首部入圍2024年戛納電影節(jié)的索馬里題材影片,并一舉入圍一種關(guān)注單元和導(dǎo)演首作金攝影機(jī)獎(jiǎng)兩大單元。
甜蜜的家2025
姜恩彬,盧仙禧,樸秀彬《甜蜜家園2025》1小時(shí)52分導(dǎo)演金弘益主演尹智淑宋承憲劉成敏
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.