戀愛禁區(qū)

6.2 播放：57萬(wàn) 更新：2026-05-12
主演：未知

暫無簡(jiǎn)介

播放通道

詳細(xì)簡(jiǎn)介

暫無簡(jiǎn)介

同類推薦

隱市英雄

彭禺厶,王莎,連奕名,來喜,于莉紅,張家豪,馬詩(shī)紅,翟星月,崔顥嚴(yán)

喜劇/動(dòng)作 　　出品公司：愛奇藝 　　制作公司：愛奇藝、天藝星杰影視 　　出品人：龔宇 　　總監(jiān)制：王曉輝 　　總制片人：楊海濤 　　行政監(jiān)制：王兆楠 　　監(jiān)制：張家豪 　　導(dǎo)演：崔俊杰 　　制片人：楊洋、李洋、於夢(mèng)迪、張瀟子、王茜 　　執(zhí)行制片人：谷雷

FPS

道本成美,泉知束,米澤成美,南久松真奈,巖永ひひお

　　佐藤鈴（道本成美）為了逃避母親（南久松真奈）的過度干涉，在川上信夫（泉知束）的引導(dǎo)下，前往東京的一處房產(chǎn)進(jìn)行內(nèi)覽。盡管被告知前住戶山本孝雄（巖永ひひお）因欠租而失蹤，鈴仍被這處優(yōu)質(zhì)房產(chǎn)所吸引。信夫提議她單獨(dú)繼續(xù)內(nèi)覽時(shí)，鈴順從了他的建議。然而，她在房中聽到某種不祥的聲音，被引導(dǎo)著打開了一扇通往異世界的門，隨后被強(qiáng)行拉了進(jìn)去。醒來后，她發(fā)現(xiàn)自己身處一座荒廢的巨大建筑中，迷茫中遇到了自稱山本孝雄的男子。這個(gè)空間被某個(gè)怪物所支配，既無法逃脫，也無法死去，真正的無間地獄。

有罪，AI如此宣判

芳根京子,臼田麻美,橋本淳, 井內(nèi)悠陽(yáng),小川冬晴,濱田信也,藤井直樹,荒井敦史,坂口涼太郎,兒島雄一,巖谷健司,岸本鲇佳,淺野和之,風(fēng)吹淳,國(guó)村隼

新人法官高遠(yuǎn)寺圓（芳根京子飾）每日忙于庭審中的證人詢問、審閱證據(jù)與鑒定報(bào)告、檢索判例以及撰寫判決書等工作。某日，圓被委以重任，負(fù)責(zé)測(cè)試性引入法院的AI系統(tǒng)“法神”。當(dāng)輸入過往審判數(shù)據(jù)后，“法神”瞬間生成的判決書與法官苦心撰寫的文書毫無二致，判決結(jié)果也完全一致。法官們?yōu)楣ぷ餍实娘w躍提升欣喜不已，唯獨(dú)圓對(duì)“法神”始終心存警惕。 　　圓與臨近退休的法官檜葉共同負(fù)責(zé)一宗18歲少年刺殺生父的案件。作為審判長(zhǎng)的檜葉在開庭前將數(shù)據(jù)輸入“法神”進(jìn)行判決模擬，AI瞬間給出的判決是“死刑”。 　　對(duì)AI能力深感興趣的檜葉。對(duì)AI愈發(fā)警惕的圓。當(dāng)陪審員們也卷入其中時(shí)，人們?cè)俣戎泵嫣綄ふ嫦嗟钠D難困境。究竟誰(shuí)能辨明真相？是AI？是人類？還是??? 　　這部社會(huì)派娛樂作品直面當(dāng)下以驚人速度滲透社會(huì)的AI技術(shù)，深刻叩問使用AI的人類應(yīng)有的姿態(tài)！

德州棉花

喬治·哈迪,杰森·道格拉斯,蒂凡妮·謝皮斯,吉因·瓊斯,盧·坦普爾,Torrence Davis,Terri Merritt Bennett,賈德·羅德曼,朱麗葉塔·丹妮埃拉

　　一位年邁的老警察深信在他小鎮(zhèn)上被捕的神秘陌生人是無辜的，進(jìn)而展開的調(diào)查就像捅了馬蜂窩一樣，將永遠(yuǎn)改變這個(gè)鎮(zhèn)子。

等待方舟

耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.