在線(xiàn)看
同款熱播
兩個(gè)心臟
金宣兒,馬東錫,李清娥,鄭仁基,樸孝朱,申正根改編自同名網(wǎng)絡(luò)連載漫畫(huà)，由原作漫畫(huà)作者鄭嚴(yán)植親執(zhí)導(dǎo)筒拍攝。該片講述了被連環(huán)殺人犯奪去家人的女子以自己的臟器作為擔(dān)保展開(kāi)報(bào)復(fù)行動(dòng)的故事。
走心男
權(quán)相佑,文彩元影片翻拍自阿根廷電影《膝下無(wú)子》，講述了高中時(shí)期遇見(jiàn)初戀的男人無(wú)意間將家庭史變成秘密而展開(kāi)的一系列風(fēng)波浪漫喜劇故事。
即興謀殺
李庚希,鄧家佳,劉奕鐵,黃曉明,岳佳頤,趙胤胤,楊皓宇,宗俊濤,呂鑫,龔毅星,于晞悅神秘孤島上只有一座何家古堡，以前死過(guò)很多人。半癱少女何思怡（李庚希 飾）離家17年后歸來(lái)，父親卻離奇失蹤，迎接她的是美艷溫柔的繼母（鄧家佳 飾）、風(fēng)度翩翩的私人醫(yī)生（黃曉明 飾）、年輕健碩的司機(jī)（劉奕鐵 飾）和萬(wàn)般貼心的女傭等人。這一切看似平靜，但不時(shí)響起的古怪聲音，似有若無(wú)的血腥氣味，似乎都藏著這座古堡不可言說(shuō)的秘密，一步步將這家人 拖入萬(wàn)劫不復(fù)的深淵，一場(chǎng)蓄謀已久的復(fù)仇大戲漸漸拉開(kāi)帷幕……
瑪麗和麥克斯
托妮·科萊特,菲利普·塞默·霍夫曼,巴瑞·哈姆弗萊斯,艾瑞克·巴納,貝塔尼·維特莫爾,蕾妮·蓋耶,伊恩·莫利·梅爾德倫,朱莉·福塞斯,約翰·弗勞思,克里斯托弗·馬西,卡羅琳·莎士比亞-艾倫,琳恩·史密斯,邁克爾·延納1976年，8歲的瑪麗·黛西·丁格爾（貝絲妮·惠特摩爾 Bethany Whitmore 配音）是澳大利亞墨爾本的一個(gè)小女孩，喜歡動(dòng)畫(huà)片“諾布利特”、甜煉乳和巧克力?，旣惖膵寢屖莻€(gè)酒鬼，而在茶葉包裝廠工作的父親平日只喜歡制作鳥(niǎo)標(biāo)本。孤獨(dú)的瑪麗沒(méi)有朋友，某一天心血來(lái)潮給美國(guó)紐約市的馬克思·杰瑞·霍羅威茨（菲利普·塞默·霍夫曼 Philip Seymour Hoffman 配音）寫(xiě)了一封信詢(xún)問(wèn)美國(guó)小孩從哪里來(lái)，并附上一根櫻桃巧克力棒。44歲的馬克思患有自閉癥及肥胖，碰巧也喜歡看“諾布利特”動(dòng)畫(huà)片及吃巧克力。二人的筆友關(guān)系從1976年維持到1994年，期間各自經(jīng)歷了許多人生起伏，直到成年的瑪麗（托妮·科萊特 Toni Collette 配音）終于來(lái)到紐約看望馬克思……本片獲2009年法國(guó)昂錫國(guó)際動(dòng)畫(huà)影展最佳動(dòng)畫(huà)長(zhǎng)片獎(jiǎng)，柏林國(guó)際電影節(jié)水晶熊獎(jiǎng)及渥太華國(guó)際動(dòng)畫(huà)電影節(jié)最高獎(jiǎng)。
屋中異蛛
艾莉拉·布朗 , 佩內(nèi)洛普·米契爾 , 瑞安·柯?tīng)?, 希薇婭·克洛卡 , 杰梅因·福勒 , 諾妮·哈澤赫斯 , 羅賓·奈文 , Tony J Black , 阿爾西拉·卡皮奧 , 丹尼·金 , 羅蘭·福爾摩斯內(nèi)詳暫無(wú)簡(jiǎn)介
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.