姐妹性交換2
勝泰有個(gè)情人柳靜 Yoojung和Yuri是姐妹,但是他們的個(gè)性相反。 裕貞是自由思想和獨(dú)立的,裕貞是膽小的。 Yuri還沒有戀人或男人的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 承泰將尤里介紹給她的朋友Jae-suk,而Jae-suk約會(huì)后試圖在她的房子里和尤里發(fā)生性關(guān)系,但失敗的方向與尤里相反。 之后,Seung-tae和Jae-seok押注Jae-suk是否會(huì)成功與Yuri發(fā)生性關(guān)系。 另一方面,對(duì)男處女戀愛的成泰知道尤里是男處女,因此給尤里提供了性教育的借口,不怕性的尤里打電話給Jae-suk并有約會(huì)。 你能成功嗎?
即刻觀影
劇情賞析
編輯推薦
毛骨悚然撞鬼經(jīng) 2022夏季特別篇
稻垣吾郎,神尾楓珠,山下美月,小野花梨,佐佐木明希,鈴木優(yōu)華,巖田剛典,梶原善,大友花戀,田中美佐子,千原靖史,高城蕾妮,百田夏菜子,玉井詩織,佐佐木彩夏
派對(duì)島上的危險(xiǎn)
林賽·德雷斯巴赫,Andrea Prevatt,James Bobo,Kate Dailey性格內(nèi)向的律師梅爾·戴爾得知她愛冒險(xiǎn)的妹妹突然去世后感到悲痛欲絕。但當(dāng)她前往收集姐姐的尸體時(shí),她很快就懷疑有人謀殺。她可能是下一個(gè)。
格吉(殺人鬼)
卡文·英瑪諾泰,Supawadee Kitisopakul,??????? ????????????
科學(xué)怪人對(duì)地底怪獸
高島忠夫,Nick Adams,水野久美,土屋嘉男,佐原健二,伊藤久哉,沢井桂子1945年,盟軍突入德國,德國瘋狂科學(xué)家李然博士研究的項(xiàng)目----科學(xué)怪人法蘭克的心臟被潛艇秘密轉(zhuǎn)移到了其同盟國日本的廣島陸軍醫(yī)院,供起研究出不死的士兵,然而核子爆炸使一切化為灰勁.十五年后,科學(xué)家在廣島研究核子放射能對(duì)人類還有環(huán)境的研究中,意外的發(fā)先了一個(gè)孩子,在檢測(cè) 中發(fā)現(xiàn)其雖然受過核子放射能的照射,但一點(diǎn)都沒有被污染,經(jīng)過調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn)原來這個(gè)孩子在核子爆炸后迷一樣的出現(xiàn)在廣島的英樹醫(yī)院(原廣島陸軍醫(yī)院),而且他還在不停的變大,所以科學(xué)家們推測(cè)當(dāng)年的法蘭克的心臟在受到了放射能的影響后,發(fā)生了異變,他們稱其為廣島怪人法蘭克.然而這時(shí)的法蘭克已經(jīng)變大到人們不可控制的地步,并且逃出了醫(yī)院,另一方面,在秋田油田,出現(xiàn)了地底怪獸,最后兩只巨大的生物在平原相遇,并進(jìn)行了激烈的戰(zhàn)斗,最后法蘭克用火戰(zhàn)勝了地底怪獸,然而與此同時(shí)一只大章魚在悄悄的接近他.........
女孩白日夢(mèng)
鄭筠熹,尤柏耘,鄭景文,古峰畢業(yè)在即,陳莉莉這位志向成為小說家的學(xué)生正努力克服拖延,面對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)與夢(mèng)想的交錯(cuò),她能否完成自己的小說,勇敢邁向新生活?
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.