新奇

余下的就是沉默

 影片講述一個(gè)導(dǎo)演，克服了各種困難拍攝一部講述羅馬尼亞獨(dú)立戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)大片的故事，值得一提的是，這部影片就是羅馬尼亞1912年拍攝的第一部電影史詩(shī)——《獨(dú)立戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)》?！队嘞碌木褪浅聊繁M管根據(jù)真人真事改編，但是男主角電影導(dǎo)演卻是虛構(gòu)的，他為了拍電影一方面要籌募資金，另一方面還要提防一家法國(guó)電影公司竊取他的創(chuàng)意。該片公映后好評(píng)如潮，一舉囊括了2009年羅馬尼亞GOPO電影獎(jiǎng)最佳影片、最佳編劇、最佳女主角等九項(xiàng)大獎(jiǎng)，被譽(yù)為羅馬尼亞近二十年最出眾的影片之一。

養(yǎng)鬼吃人9：?jiǎn)⑹句?/h3>史蒂文·布蘭德,丹尼爾·布蘭,Jolene Andersen

　　某個(gè)晴朗假日，美國(guó)青年尼克（Jay Gillespie 飾）和好友史蒂文（Nick Eversman 飾）驅(qū)車(chē)穿越國(guó)境線，打算前往墨西哥的提華納尋找一次絕佳的艷遇。他們很快便鎖定了一個(gè)性感尤物，但是突如其來(lái)的意外讓二人的狂歡設(shè)想灰飛煙滅。正當(dāng)他們垂頭喪氣之際，某當(dāng)?shù)厝怂徒o二人一個(gè)精致的魔方。尼克和史蒂文的命運(yùn)就此改寫(xiě)，他們也有如人間蒸發(fā)一般消失?！　∧峥撕褪返傥牡氖й櫧o各自家人莫大的打擊，在一次家庭聚會(huì)中，艾瑪（Tracey Fairaway 飾）從兩人的行李中找到了那枚魔方，而渾身是血的史蒂文也突然出現(xiàn)在房間內(nèi)。家人們對(duì)此感到驚奇喜悅，卻不知道丁頭鬼的魔爪正慢慢伸向他們……

抵擋計(jì)劃

一名被困在公寓里的年輕人，門(mén)外有一群惡魔，他必須找到一種方法度過(guò)夜晚，逃離213號(hào)公寓。

狼人2025

　　布雷克（克里斯托弗·阿波特 Christopher Abbott 飾）是一名住在舊金山的丈夫和父親。當(dāng)他自己的父親失蹤并被判定死亡之后，他繼承了他位于俄勒岡州鄉(xiāng)下偏遠(yuǎn)地區(qū)的童年老家。當(dāng)他和他事業(yè)有成的女強(qiáng)人妻子夏莉特（朱莉婭·加納 Julia Garner 飾）的婚姻逐漸走向破裂，布雷克就說(shuō)服夏莉特帶著他們年幼的女兒金潔（瑪?shù)贍栠_(dá)·弗 思 Matilda Firth 飾）一起離開(kāi)城市，前往他的童年老家度假?！　〉钱?dāng)這一家人在深夜來(lái)到這座農(nóng)舍時(shí)，他們突然遭到一只看不見(jiàn)的怪獸攻擊，為了逃離危險(xiǎn)，他們就躲進(jìn)農(nóng)舍里面，并且將所有入口封住，而那只怪獸則在外面徘徊。當(dāng)他們驚懼地試圖度過(guò)漫漫長(zhǎng)夜時(shí)，布雷克卻開(kāi)始出現(xiàn)奇怪的舉動(dòng)，而且逐漸變成一種不知名的怪物，于是夏莉特就被迫必須決定：到底是屋內(nèi)的恐怖更致命，還是外面的危險(xiǎn)更可怕？

孤獨(dú)癥候群

　　An epic mosaic of lonely people with crossed destinies who will set their sights on Arthur Morhan, a psychoanalyst on the verge of a breakdown.

等待方舟

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.