淫室奴妻

8.3 播放：53萬 更新：2026-05-12
主演： ???/

　????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??

播放通道

詳細(xì)簡(jiǎn)介

　????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??

同類推薦

泰勒·湯姆林森：浪女回頭

泰勒·湯姆林森

泰勒·湯姆林森（Taylor Tomlinson）在她的第四部喜劇特輯《浪子回頭的女兒》（Prodigal Daughter）中，以一個(gè)關(guān)于解構(gòu)信仰、處理宗教創(chuàng)傷、探索性取向和面對(duì)死亡恐懼的緊張新時(shí)刻回到了她的根本。

鬼三驚2

薩瓦特·博拉娜波拉特,素帕娜·吉塔勒拉,雷·麥克唐納,辛扎伊·本班尼,Apapattra Meesang

　　《尸還魂》血性男子阿良發(fā)現(xiàn)女友桂兒和另一個(gè)男人波蘇搞在一起，憤怒的阿良駕駛機(jī)車追趕，結(jié)果不慎車禍身亡。葬禮的第三天，平日的狐朋狗友悉數(shù)到場(chǎng)，連桂兒和波蘇也到場(chǎng)上香，而靈異事件也突然發(fā)生。在此之后，眾人尋找阿良丟失的手機(jī)，阿良的鬼影卻接連出現(xiàn)；《獻(xiàn)陰琴》某女子教會(huì)學(xué)校，傳說曾有一個(gè)為情而死的修女，她死后變成無頭女鬼，在夜晚彈著動(dòng)聽的鋼琴。而如果虔誠地向他許愿，很快就會(huì)夢(mèng)想成真。但是這也伴隨著可怕的危險(xiǎn)。充滿嫉妒和愛欲的女孩，為情涉入險(xiǎn)地；《祭紙?jiān)芳堅(jiān)昀习宓睦掀胖橹橥庥鰵w來，對(duì)老公大獻(xiàn)殷勤。常被欺負(fù)的小伙計(jì)阿默剛好從網(wǎng)上發(fā)現(xiàn)一則車禍消息，而這個(gè)消息讓他大為震驚！恐怖不眠夜，陰雨連綿。

萊姆豪斯的殺人魔

奧利維亞·庫克,比爾·奈伊,道格拉斯·布斯,埃迪·馬森,瑪利亞·瓦沃德,薩姆·里德,亞當(dāng)·布朗,戴維·鮑姆伯,保羅·里特,丹尼爾·梅斯,馬克·坦迪,摩根·華金斯,彼得·蘇利文,亨利·古德曼,達(dá)米安·托馬斯

　　改編自彼得·克羅伊德小說《丹·雷諾和萊姆豪斯的殺人魔》。講述1880年倫敦的萊姆豪斯區(qū)發(fā)生謀殺案，人們認(rèn)為這是古老生物石巨人所為，但真相另有隱情。

血咒圣痕

藤原啟治

冷峻英俊的查爾斯·J·克里斯芬多（置鲇龍?zhí)?配音）是得到梵蒂岡認(rèn)證的圣職者，同時(shí)也是一名擁有強(qiáng)悍戰(zhàn)斗力的獨(dú)立吸血鬼賞金獵人。但他白色身份的另一面，是隱藏著無盡秘密的吸血鬼。他從不吸食獻(xiàn)血，是一名虔誠祈禱的圣徒。不過有一個(gè)例外，那就是查爾斯的祖先強(qiáng)尼·雷夫羅（藤原啟治 配音）。雷夫羅當(dāng)初利用符咒自行墮落成一名吸血鬼，堪稱所有吸血鬼的祖先。他為查爾斯提供源源不斷的血液，每當(dāng)查爾斯前往世界各地執(zhí)行任務(wù)時(shí)，雷夫羅便以“食物”的身份隨行。這次的任務(wù)有些奇怪，修女向查爾斯展示了一名神秘少女，而交換的代價(jià)便是查爾斯的主人兼食物——雷夫羅……　　本片根據(jù)日本漫畫家黑乃奈奈繪的同名原著改編。

等待方舟

耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.